Kathy Lannigan
WAVE Virtual School
715-261-0527
klannigan@wausauschools.org
Gina Lehman
715-261-0550
glehman@wausauschools.org
Professional Learning, Frontline,
ELL-Bilingual, EL Resource Teachers & EL Licensing, Title IIA, Title III, Title IVA
Mary Metzinger
715-261-0530
mmetzinger@wausauschools.org
Title I, Title III,
Summer Learning,
ELA / Math Leadership
Rachel Rosenthal
715-261-0565
rrosenthal@wausauschools.org
Early College Credit Program, Start College Now Program, Athletics, CTE/STC, Youth Apprenticeship, School Forest, PE/Health, Fine Arts, Secondary Education, IB, AP
Joanne Ruechel
715-261-0525
jruechel@wausauschools.or
EduClimber, Superkids, Wonders, MAP, Assessments, Web Pages, Elementary Science,
PK-5 Math Leadership
Jon Euting
Assistant Superintendent
of Academics
715-261-0526
jeuting@wausauschools.org
Dr. Katie Colwell
Director of Secondary Education
715-261-0551
kcolwell@wausauschools.org
Julie Schell
Director of Elementary Education
715-261-0531
jschell@wausauschools.org
- Annual Academic Standards
- Core Content Areas
- English Learners (EL)
- Multi-Tiered System of Support (RtI, PBIS, SEL)
- Title I
- School Improvement Plans
- Virtual Learning Day Protocols
Annual Academic Standards
Core Content Areas
Literacy Department
Literacy Coordinators
Melanie Hansen
Sandy Lewens
English Department
Horace Mann Middle School
Melanie Kennedy
April Grzadzielewski
John Muir Middle School
Paula Reed
East High School
Jamie Woller
West High School
John Masanz
Global Language Department
Horace Mann Middle School
Heather Janssen
John Muir Middle School
Heather Janssen
East High School
Jannel McCallum
West High School
Jerry Reinardy
Mission:
The mission of the Global Language Program in the Wausau School District is to develop the four basic linguistic skills of listening, speaking, reading and writing by providing a variety of cultural experiences.
Math Department
Math Coordinators
Kim Pearson
Scott Strand
Horace Mann Middle School
Mark Beversdorf
John Muir Middle School
Dana Parlier Pease
East High School
Doris Martin
West High School
Jason Myers
James Wendling
Science Department
Horace Mann Middle School
Nate Thome
John Muir Middle School
Pete Colwell
East High School
Mark Ekiss
West High School
Mike Scheidler
EEA
Kim Zimmermann
Elementary Science Specialists:
Rib Mountain & Stettin
Kassandra Felts
Hawthorn Hills & Lincoln
Travis Sprague
Thomas Jefferson & Riverview
Tori Dienger
John Marshall, Grant & G.D. Jones
Kendy Selby
South Mountain & Maine
Tabitha Graun
G. D. Jones & Riverview
Morgen Severt
Franklin & Hewitt Texas
Kristine Zarins
Social Studies Department
Horace Mann Middle School
Andy Meyer
Mang Thao
John Muir Middle School
Heidi Wiesman
East High School
John Lakus
West High School
Elayna Clark
English Learners (EL)
English Learner (EL)
District Contacts
Shannon Charbarneau
scharbar@wausauschools.org
EL Coach & Program Implementation Specialist
Libby White
ewhite@wausauschools.org
EL Coordinator
Gina Lehman
glehman@wausauschools.org
EL & Education Department Administrative Assistant
EL Mission Statement
The Wausau School District’s EL Program facilitates the acquisition of English by Limited English Proficient Students in a natural, effective manner while acquiring content area knowledge as well as acclimation and acculturation skills enabling them to become self-sufficient, responsible citizens.
BELIEF STATEMENTS ABOUT EL STUDENTS
FAMILY INVOLVEMENT – We believe that EL students:
- have families that are in integral part of the educational process
- should have district support in promoting family involvement.
CULTURE/LANGUAGE - We believe that EL students:
- should be supported and encouraged in their native language and culture
- must be culturally understood by teachers, fellow students, and community
- should have their culture represented in all curriculum areas.
EDUCATORS - We believe that EL students:
- have a right to professional educational services from qualified, caring, and accessible ESL staff
- have the right to culturally sensitive school personnel.
SELF ESTEEM - We believe that EL students:
- need positive role models
- should be recognized as individuals
- should be provided acceptance and pride in their differences
- can learn
- should recognize and promote their own gender equity.
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT - We believe that EL students:
- should have a safe physical and emotional learning environment
- should have a person and place where they feel free to experiment with the language and having their needs met
- should not be isolated totally from their English speaking peer
- should be provided with an appropriate sized classroom and class.
CURRICULUM / INSTRUCTION - We believe that EL students:
- learn at their own pace
- need realistic approaches
- need age appropriate language.
- need a variety of methodology of instruction.
- can learn.
- need to learn the four basic skills of English so they.
- can be successful lifelong learners.
- have a need and a right to be taught curriculum that is meaningful, comprehensible, and developmentally appropriate.
- need to be provided the experiences necessary to develop background knowledge to be successful learners and citizen in BOTH cultures.
- learn just as any other students do with wide ranges in abilities and/or disabilities.
- they should be taught using developmentally appropriate materials.
- learn best in a challenging yet non-threatening environment where experiential, whole language methods are used for authentic purposes.
The Wausau School District has 13 Elementary Schools, two Middle Schools, and two High Schools.
At the Elementary level, there are 178 ESL Certified, ESL Kindergarten or ELL/Mainstream teachers. Middle School has 11 ESL Certified or ESL/Mainstream Teachers and at the High School level, there are 11 ESL Certified or ESL/Mainstream teachers.
English Language Proficiency Levels
The definitions of the five limited-English language proficiency levels, as well s Level 6, one of two fully-English language proficiency levels, are from PI 13.08(3)(1)-(6), Wisconsin Administrative Rule. Level 7, the other fully-English language proficiency level, is used for purposes of state reporting/state testing.
Level 1: Beginning/Preproduction (WIDA Level = Entering):
- A pupil shall be classified level 1 if the pupil does not understand or speak English with the exception of a few isolated words or expressions.
Level 2: Beginning/Production (WIDA Level = Beginning):
A pupil shall be classified level 2 if all of the following criteria are met:
- The pupil understands and speaks conversational and academic English with hesitancy and difficulty.
- The pupil understands parts of lessons and simple directions.
- The pupil is at a pre-emergent or emergent level of reading and writing in English, significantly below grade level.
Level 3: Intermediate (WIDA Level = Developing):
A pupil shall be classified level 3 if all of the following criteria are met:
- The pupil understands and speaks conversational and academic English with decreasing hesitancy and difficulty.
- The pupil is post-emergent, developing reading comprehension and writing skills in English.
- The pupil’s English literacy skills allow the student to demonstrate academic knowledge in content areas with assistance.
Level 4: Advanced Intermediate (WIDA Level = Expanding):
A pupil shall be classified level 4 if all of the following criteria are met:
- The pupil understands and speaks conversational English without apparent difficulty, but understands and speaks academic English with some hesitancy.
- The pupil continues to acquire reading and writing skills in content areas needed to achieve grade level expectations with assistance.
Level 5: Advanced (WIDA Level = Bridging):
A pupil shall be classified level 5 if all of the following criteria are met:
- The pupil understands and speaks conversational and academic English well.
- The pupil is near proficient in reading, writing, and content area skills needed to meet grade level expectations. The pupil requires occasional support.
Level 6: Formerly Limited-English Proficient/Now Fully-English Proficient:
A pupil shall be classified level 6 if all of the following criteria are met:
- The pupil was formerly limited-English proficient and is now fully-English proficient.
- The pupil reads, writes, speaks and comprehends English within academic classroom settings.
Level 7: Fully-English Proficient/Never Limited-English Proficient:
The student was never classified as limited-English proficient and does not fit the definition of a limited-English proficient student outlined in either state or federal law.
Criteria for Determining Limited English Proficiency
- When the Wausau School District Student Home Language Survey indicates that a language other than English is or has been used, language proficiency assessment will be administered by an ESL teacher.
- When language proficiency assessments indicates a student is eligible for ESL instruction, the student must be assigned an LEP Level.
- The responsibility of establishing LEP Levels rests with the ESL teacher, not the mainstream teacher.
- Annually, all LEP students’ levels of proficiency must be reassessed and updated according to district guidelines.
- The criteria for determining LEP Levels are based on a combination of observation and test scores.
- The test used for determining LEP Levels is:
WIDA: ACCESS for ELLs 2.0
ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 is a secure large-scale English language proficiency assessment administered to Kindergarten through 12th grade students who have been identified as English language learners (ELLs). It is given annually in WIDA Consortium member states to monitor students' progress in acquiring academic English. ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 is only available to Consortium member states.
ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 is aligned with the WIDA English Language Development Standards and assesses each of the four language domains of Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing.
The assessment is available in both paper-based and online formats for Grades 1-12, while Kindergarten and Alternate ACCESS for ELLs are paper-based tests.
Purpose and Use of ACCESS for ELLs 2.0
- Helps students and families understand students’ current level of English language proficiency along the developmental continuum.
- Serves as one of multiple measures used to determine whether students are prepared to exit English language support programs.
- Generates information that assists in determining whether ELLs have attained the language proficiency needed to participate meaningfully in content area classrooms without program support.
- Provides teachers with information they can subsequently use to enhance instruction and learning in programs for their English language learners.
- Provides districts with information that will help them evaluate the effectiveness of their ESL/bilingual programs.
- Meets, and exceeds, federal requirements for the monitoring and reporting of ELLs' progress toward English language proficiency.
Features
The tasks on the new summative assessment will continue to assess the language students need to process or produce in various school contexts. Each assessment item and task will target at least one of the five WIDA ELD Standards:
- Social and Instructional Language
- Language of Language Arts
- Language of Mathematics
- Language of Science
- Language of Social Studies
About the W-APT - Kindergarten
The Kindergarten WIDA-ACCESS Placement Test (K W-APT) is an English language proficiency "screener" test given to incoming Kindergarteners who may be designated as English language learners. It assists educators with programmatic placement decisions such as identification and placement of ELLs. The K W-APT is one component of WIDA's comprehensive assessment system.
The K W-APT does not assign scores across the full range of WIDA ELP levels 1-6. Instead, scores for Speaking and Listening are marked as showing low, mid, high, or exceptionalproficiency. Scoring details can be found in the K W-APT Test Administration Manual and on the scoring sheets.
The WIDA MODEL for Kindergarten assessment yields a score between 1 and 6 on the WIDA ELP scale. It may be an optional replacement to the Kindergarten W-APT.
The K W-APT is:
- An aid to identify students who may be candidates for English language support services
- A measure that provides diagnostic information that may be used as additional criteria to guide instruction and service delivery
Multi-Tiered System of Support (RtI, PBIS, SEL)
MTSS is the practice of systematically providing differing levels of intensity of support based on student responsiveness to instruction and intervention in academics and behavior. All students are supported through this structure of supports and instruction. Within WSD schools, the multi-level system of support is a three-tiered structure of support designed to maximize student achievement in the general education setting.
Response to Intervention (RtI) is an organizational framework that guides implementation of a multi-level system of support to achieve academic and behavioral success for all. The RtI framework includes three essential elements:
- high quality instruction (in academics and behavior)
- balanced assessment
- collaboration among staff and families
RtI is in the process of being implemented in WSD schools around literacy, mathematics and also in behavior through the PBIS framework which closely mirrors the traditional RtI framework for addressing student needs.
Schools are encouraged to stay up-to-date with best practices and share success stories across the district from various schools.
These three essential elements, embedded with culturally responsive practices and family engagement, both supported by leadership and organizational/ team structures, interact within a multi-level system of support.
Tier 1: Universal core curriculum instruction and practices ALL students receive.
At any given time, 80% or more of students should demonstrate sufficient progress through core instruction and/or practices. Classroom teachers provide Tier 1 (Core Content) instruction in both academics and behavior. WSD strives to have parents and community partners participate on various school and district committees.
Tier 2: Intervention coupled with ongoing progress monitoring provided to students needing additional support or enrichment in academics and behaviors.
In a traditional RtI framework the Tier 2 level is intended to support approximately 5-15% of the student population who require support in addition to the Tier 1 universal practices.
Tier 2 academic interventions are provided in addition to core instruction. Academic interventions are provided by classroom teachers. Tier 2 behavioral (PBIS) interventions are typically provided by teachers and pupil service staff and supported by administrators.
Tier 3: Intensive interventions provided to students requiring an individualized plan of action. These intensive interventions may include the following: replacement or additional curriculum, and/or instructional and behavioral strategies.
In a traditional RtI framework the Tier 3 level is intended to support approximately 5% of the student population who require support in addition to the Tier 1 and 2 practices. Tier 3 interventions are typically managed by a building intervention team. Collaboration among a variety of staff, parents, and when appropriate community agencies is a typical part of the Tier 3 process.
Tier 3 interventions support students whose performance is well above or well below the district benchmark decision points on academic and behavioral data. Tier 2 progress monitoring data supports the need for Tier 3.
RtI Framework Key Components & Useful Links
The Resonse to Intervention Framework is designed to reach all students. In a healthy RtI framework for academics or behavior schools must consider: culturally responsive practices, English Language Learners, students and trauma, students with disabilities, gifted and talented in order to ensure reaching all students.
- Students and Trauma
- Gifted and Talented
- Students with Disabilities
- Attendance
- Trauma
- RtI Process
- PBIS
- RtI - Math
- RtI - Literacy
- SEL / Leader In Me
- Specific Learning Disability (SLD)
Attendance
- Attendance should be looked at through a school's RtI/PBIS framework. Attendance is a responsible behavior and falls in within your other expectations at your school. Attendance at the school level should be addressed on a regular basis in the same manner other behaviors are addressed.
- The school leader is responsible for maintaining the integrity of the Attendance Systems for their building.
- Identify an attendance officer. This may be a social worker, secretary, assistant principal, or principal.
- School staff will utilize Infinite Campus to record attendance information and documentation parent/guardian contact regarding attendance.
- The principal/school leader or designee will review with the school staff proper and required attendance record keeping as needed.
- Schools will follow established policies regarding absences and tardiness.
- Schools will follow the established procedure for obtaining proper documentation and updating the attendance record of students that enter/leave the building after the start of the school day and before the end of the day.
- Schools will follow the established procedure for identifying and documenting tardy students.
- Schools will follow the established procedure for securing and documenting excuses for student absences.
- Schools will communicate expected attendance procedures with parents and guardians.
- Schools will follow the established procedure for recording student attendance when teachers are absent and a substitute teacher is responsible for recording attendance.
- The principal/school leader and attendance officer will monitor attendance data throughout the school year and respond accordingly.
- Recognize Attendance as a Responsible behavior as part of your PBIS Framework
Possible Strategies
- Attaching attendance to School-Wide Expectations Matrix
- Teaching the expectation of attendance
- Include attendance in Tier 1 School-Wide Acknowledgement System (high-interest and meaningful)
- Messaging about good and improved attendance i.e. send postcards, calls home, direct contact with students.
- Positive School Climate/ Culture: relationship building, positive decorum with students, customer service to all visitors, opportunities for students to engage in school outside of the classroom (clubs), and high levels of engagement in class
Trauma
- Trauma is an experience that is emotionally painful, distressful, or shocking, which can result in lasting emotional and physical effects. Not all traumatic events have the same impact on children. A child traumatic stress reaction occurs when children and adolescents are exposed to traumatic events or situations that overwhelm their ability to cope.
- Acute trauma is usually a one-time event. Complex trauma is trauma that: persists over time, is a violation of safety in an intimate relationship, is persistent but unpredictably episodic, and is often progressive over time.
- Typically, traumatic experiences evoke feelings of extreme fear and helplessness. Some common examples include, but are not limited to, the following experiences:
- Child abuse and maltreatment
- School related violence
- Gang violence and threat
- Criminal victimization
- Medical trauma
- Loss/death
- Domestic violence
- Community violence
- Parent/self incarceration
- Foster care/out-of-home placement
- Parent divorce/separation
- Parent drug use
It is important to note that everyone has different reactions to traumatic events. Reactions are based one’s age, personal resilient characteristics, and other supports in one’s life, to name a few. Therefore, not everyone who experiences traumatic events will be traumatized.
Again, to ensure intervention effectiveness, school staffs need to experience a perspective shift from perceiving behavior as a way to manipulate or act disobedient, to seeing behavior as a way to communicate needs and get needs met. The fidelity of interventions is not reliable without training.
RtI Process
Continuous review of student progress within an RtI system involves a balanced, systematic process of constant inquiry. Multiple measures are used to determine the current skill level of a student or group of students, how students are responding to core curriculum and instruction, and how students are responding to interventions or additional challenges. This system is comprised of a continuum of assessments highlighted below. Each type may be used to plan,support, monitor and/or verify learning.
The Wausau School District utilizes a systematic problem solving approach within a team framework to address student needs. Presently, at the K-5 levels, each building has an RtI team that meets weekly to address Academic (A) and/or Behavioral (B) student challenges.
Screen
SCREEN: What's the Problem?
- Within the balanced assessment system, a universal screening process is used to determine whether each student is likely to meet, not meet or exceed academic benchmarks or behavioral expectations through the analysis of data from multiple measures. The process begins with Universal Screener data to determine if a change in the core curriculum and instruction is needed, especially when less than 80% of all students are meeting academic and behavioral expectations.
- The screening process also includes the identification of individual students in need of intervention. Starting with the students in the bottom 24th% and upper quartile of the academic universal screener, data from additional sources is used to determine, by grade, which students are in need of intervention. Behavior screening starts with Behavior Tracking Form (BTF) data as the universal screener and considers teacher, parent and/or student referral requests.
- The Wausau School District currently uses the FastBridge Learning system as their academic Universal Screening tool K-6th grade. FastBridge Learning is a research based screening and progress monitoring tool that employs national norms and standard assessments to help guide instruction. Three to four times per year each elementary buildings RtI-A team meets with grade level teachers to review Universal Screening data and ensure that students are continuously receiving the supports they need.
- The Wausau School Districts secondary systems 7th-12th grades are currently exploring Universal Screening tools. Presently, Wausau East High School is utilizing the Early Warning System (EWS) for their 9-10th graders. They have worked in collaboration with the WI RtI Center and have presented at the WI RtI Summit 2015.
- The Wausau School District 4K sites and one elementary school are currently piloting the use of a behavioral, social/ emotional universal screener for students. Universal screeners assist in identifying internalizing behaviors of students so that preventative early intervention services can be implemented.
- Schools should always strive to triangulate their student data. As such, schools can also use the following within their screening process:
- Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening or PALS. PALS is a research based screening tool required of all Wisconsin schools for K-2nd grade students and is provided through the University of Virginia.
Identify
IDENTIFY: Why is it occurring?
- After identifying a student's area of need, problem-solving teams need to determine which interventions, strategies, and techniques are best fitted for the individual student. Team discussions center around what supports individual students need to reach their individualized goals. A plan of intervention can be created for each student.
- For behavior, all students are supported in following the school rules and expectations as the focus for their first Tier 2 Intervention (subsequent interventions for behavior involve additional team analysis).
- For academics, the area of need is determined through analyzing FastBridge Learning data. Each student has a unique baseline aligned to their academic area of need and intervention grade level. Target goals are set based on relevant growth rates and/or benchmarks.
Implement
IMPLEMENT: What are we going to do about it?
- At this stage in the process students receive their assigned intervention on a regular basis. The recommended length of an academic intervention is dependent on following the selected programs fidelity recommendations within the school schedule. Recommended length of a behavior intervention plan is 4-6 weeks. Progress monitoring, including review and evaluation of fidelity and student response occurs routinely as set in the plan and school routine.
What are interventions?
- Scientifically research based
- Have a high probability of producing change for a large number of students
- Designed to be used the same way across many students (not differentiated for students at the Tier 2 level)
- Administered by certified school-based staff
- Continuous and on-going (not a one-time support)
- Progress monitored on a regular and on-going basis
Interventions are not:
- Preferential seating
- Differentiation in the classroom (a Tier 1 practice)
- Shorter assignments
- Retentions/suspension
- Peer tutoring
- Parent Contact/Home Visit
- One-on-one conference/contract with student
Intervention Timing:
Must occur outside the core curriculum (student is not removed from math instruction to receive a math intervention). Most of the Wausau School Districts academic interventions occur during the scheduled Intervention & Enrichment block - which is scheduled for all students. Some intervention may also occur before or after school, or during the school day outside of core instruction.
Elementary Schools
- Intervention/Enrichment occur within the extended instructional time
- Students are working on personalized learning or an enrichment activity while others are receiving the intervention
- Providing an intervention block/time
- Students remain in their classroom or may group students based on needs across classrooms/grade levels
- Behavior
- CICO morning greeting occurs at the start of the school day, individual teachers meet with students throughout the day while other students are engaged in academics (this meeting takes 1-2 minutes)
- SAIG occurs weekly outside of the classroom setting for 20-40 minutes. It is suggested to rotate the day and time of these meetings to ensure that students are not missing the same instructional material each week.
High Schools
Intervention courses (students receive a .5 elective credit for completion) in addition to required coursework (student enrolls in a math course and a math intervention course.)
All students attend an ELO period daily, some students receive interventions during this time while other students are engaged in other school activities and discussions (relationship building, enrichment activities, study skills, clubs, etc.)
- Personalized learning lab staffed with teachers
- Students receive both direct instruction in small group and online-computer based intervention support
- Behavior
- CICO morning meeting occurs at the start of the day, each classroom teacher meets with the student once during the academic block while other students are engaged in academics (this meeting takes 1-2 minutes)
- SAIG occur weekly outside the classroom setting for 20-40 minutes. It is suggested to rotate the day and time of these sessions to ensure that the student is not missing the same course on a weekly basis.
Monitor
MONITOR: Is it working?
- Progress monitoring is used to assess students’ academic and behavioral performance on an on-going basis, to measure student improvement or responsiveness to instruction, and to evaluate the fidelity and effectiveness of instruction.
- Progress Monitoring is:
- Formative and on-going
- Examines student performance frequently over time
- Entered into FastBridge Learning and/or SWIS regularly
- Usually conducted by the classroom teacher
- Used to make decisions around success of the intervention for the individual student
- Used to make decisions at a systems level around interventions school-wide
- Progress Monitoring is:
- Presently in our K-5 buildings, academic progress monitoring data is collected weekly for any student in a regular education intervention who is performing below the 25th% on our Universal Screening measures. Students in an intervention whom are above the 25th% are able to be progress monitored bi-weekly. Students receiving special education services are progress monitored bi-weekly.
- The Wausau School District currently uses FastBridge Learning for literacy and math progress monitoring in K-8th grade.
- For behavior, students are monitored through behavior tracking forms, daily progress reports, and teacher or staff feedback. Student data is monitored twice a month (at a minimum).
Evaluate
EVALUATE
- The buildings RtI A/B teams (K-5) monitors Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions. The RTI A/B team monitors system fidelity by evaluating the success rate of each intervention offered at the school. If less than 70% of students are responding to an individual intervention, system issues exist and need to be addressed to improve implementation fidelity. The team also looks at individual student data to determine if a he/she is responding to an intervention. If a student is not responding to an intervention the team revisits the intervention for this particular student. The teams are also responsible for monitoring the fidelity and effectiveness of intervention for individual students.
- Increase the frequency of the intervention
- Increase the length of the intervention
- Change the time of the day the intervention occurs
- Change the actual intervention
- Analyze the student need again and address a different foundational skill
- Change the small group the student participates in the intervention with
- Assure the intervention and progress monitoring are done with fidelity
- To determine if a student is responding to an academic intervention teams and teachers should use the 3-Point Rule.
PBIS
Welcome to the Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) page. This webpage will share resources for implementation of PBIS, spotlight practices and events in our schools, and provide contact
information for PBIS external and district coaches.
What is PBIS?
PBIS is a proactive systems approach to establishing the behavioral supports and social culture needed for all students in a school to achieve social, emotional, and academic success. As a Response to Intervention (RtI) model, PBIS applies a three-tiered system of support, and a problem-solving process to enhance the capacity of schools to effectively educate all students.
Research supports that a PBIS system, implemented with fidelity, effectively reduces classroom disruptions and student suspensions through a school-wide, systematic, tiered-intervention approach, which leads to increased student achievement. School-wide PBIS provides an operational framework for achieving these outcomes.
The goals of PBIS are to:
- Increase data-based decision-making on behavior and reinforce across all school settings.
- Increase consistent use and effect of research-based behavioral strategies among all school staff at school-wide, classroom, and individual student levels.
- Reduce use of reactive discipline measures in schools (e.g., office discipline referrals, detentions, suspensions, expulsions) for all students.
- Increase academic achievement levels of all students.
- Implement effective intervention plans for students with the most comprehensive behavioral and emotional needs that support and evaluate their success across home, school, and community.
- Increase capacity of general education settings to successfully educate students with disabilities and prevent academic and/or social failures of all students.
- Increase capacity of schools and districts to address over- and under-representation of students by ethnicity relative to discipline, disability status, and academic achievement with access to data on these outcomes.
- Improve attendance by establishing a culture of attendance, acknowledging outstanding attendance and supporting students at-risk for chronic absenteeism.
School-wide PBIS emphasizes four integrated elements: (a) data for decision making, (b) measurable outcomes supported and evaluated by data, (c) practices with evidence that these outcomes are achievable and (d) systems that efficiently and effectively support implementation of these practices.
School-wide PBIS emphasizes four integrated elements: (a) data for decision-making, (b) measurable outcomes supported and evaluated by data, (c) practices with evidence that these outcomes are achievable and (d) systems that efficiently and effective support implementation of these practices.
Schools that establish systems with the capacity to implement school-wide PBIS with integrity and durability have teaching and learning environments that are:
- Less reactive, aversive, dangerous and exclusionary, and
- More engaging, responsive, preventive and productive.
In addition, these environments are more effective and efficient in their capacity to:
- Address classroom management and disciplinary issues (e.g., attendance, tardiness, antisocial behavior),
- Improve supports for students whose behaviors require more specialized assistance (e.g., emotional and behavioral disorders, mental health), and
- Most importantly, maximize academic engagement and achievement for all students
The Wausau School District has had a Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) system in place for several years.
Each school has chosen a set behavioral expectations (i.e. Be Safe, Be Respectful and Be Responsible) as their school-wide expectations. The expectations are clearly defined for each of the common areas or times throughout the school. The expectations are systematically taught and demonstrated through behavioral lesson plans, also known as "Cool Tools," on a schedule developed by the Tier 1/Universal Team. The schedule is largely dependent on school data, both objective and anecdotal, that suggests which potential or problem behaviors need to be addressed as priorities.
Students are frequently recognized and appreciated, often when they least expect it, for following the expectations. They are "caught doing the right thing" as part of a school-wide acknowledgement system. Schools often will use some type of "ticket" system as part of a token-economy system where students can earn a reward. Rewards may be individualized or classroom-based and can vary from school to school. Schools with middle and high school grades are encouraged to have a student advisory group to help identify which rewards may be valued most by the students.
When problem behavior does occur, PBIS supports agreement within the school about what constitutes a minor (managed in the classroom) versus a major (managed in the office) behavior. There is a clear set of definitions and processes for situations that involve negative behavior so that the school environment becomes a calmer, more predictable and more consistent place to be for students and adults alike.
Tier 1 Supports
Tier 1: Universal PBS – Processes and procedures intended for all students and staff, in all settings and across campus. This is intended to impact approximately 80% of your students and staff.
Classroom - Processes and procedures that reflect school-wide expectations for student behavior coupled with pre-planned strategies applied within classroom settings. Depending upon the data, classroom applications can be viewed as either a Tier 1 or Tier 2 intervention (do all teachers need support or just a few?)
Universal Behavior Expectations
The primary prevention of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) consists of rules, routines, and physical arrangements that are developed and taught by school staff to prevent initial occurrences of behavior the school would like to target for change. For example, a school team may determine that disrespect for self, others, and property is a set of behaviors they would like to target for change. They may choose the positive reframing of that behavior and make that one of their behavioral expectations. Respect Yourself, Others, and Property would be one of their behavioral expectations. Research indicates that 3-5 behavioral expectations that are positively stated, easy to remember, and significant to the climate are best. At the end of the year, a researcher should be able to walk into the school and ask ten random students to name the behavioral expectations and 80% or better of the students should be able to tell the researcher what they are and give examples of what they look like in action.
The building leadership team would then decide how they were going to teach these behaviors to the students. Some schools choose to have stations and rotate all the children through various locations where the adults act out the appropriate behaviors relevant to each area. Some schools choose to show a non-example first and then the appropriate example last. After adults model the appropriate behavior, students emulate the new behavior before they rotate to the next learning station. Adults give feedback to the students on their performance during the training, to alleviate any misrules they may begin.
Hallway Matrix
Bathroom Matrix
High School Behavior Matrix
School-Wide & Classroom Behavior Matrices
What we know from research in the science of behavior is that by directly teaching our behavioral expectations and acknowledging student use of those expectations with high rates of specific positive feedback, the majority (80%) of the students will follow the rules.
Each school has a school-wide matrix which outlines their 3-5 behavior expectations and procedures for following the expectations.
Classroom matrices are based on the school’s 3-5 expectations and common routines that happen within the school day for all students and staff. The classroom matrix is being used to increase student understanding of school-wide expectations in the classroom. It is often shared with the principal so reteaching of expectations can happen every time a student is removed from class for problem behavior. The classroom matrix is shared with families to increase home/school partnering.
Universal Acknowledgement System
Most Wausau School District schools use a ticket system to acknowledge students demonstrating positive behaviors. Each staff member has tickets to give out to the students whenever they see positive behaviors taking place throughout the school. The tickets have varying uses in our schools. For example, they can be used in school stores as well as entered into a school-wide drawing. Each school is unique in their acknowledgement system structure.
The purpose of an acknowledgement system is to:
- Foster a welcoming and positive climate
- Builds a sense of community
- Focuses staff and student attention on desired behaviors
- Increases the likelihood that desired behaviors will be increased.
- Reduce the time spent correcting student misbehavior
Data Collection System
Wausau School District uses the School Wide Information System (SWIS) Program for data collection. SWIS is a web-based software system used for for gathering, entering, summarizing, reporting and using behavior tracking form (BTF) referral information. Data is used to develop safe and effective educational environments as well as provide appropriate interventions for students in need.
Behavior Flow Chart
Behavioral errors are corrected proactively. When students violate behavioral expectations, clear procedures are needed for providing information to them that their behavior was unacceptable, and preventing that unacceptable behavior from resulting in inadvertent rewards. Students, teachers, and administrators all should be able to predict what will occur when behavioral errors are identified. Behavior Tracking Forms (BTF) are sometimes used to refer incidents or chronic disruptions to the administration. BTFs are also a primary data source for school teams when looking to make modifications to the system and/or determine students who may be in need of further interventions. The Behavior Flowchart is used to help teachers distinguish major from minor behavioral incidents as well as determine if a behavior is managed within the classroom or referred to administration.
Behavior Lessons/Cool Tools
Behavior lessons/cool tools are developed by school teams to serve as a coaching tool to help staff teach and reinforce the behavioral expectations in the different areas of the school building.
Tier 2 Interventions/Supports
Tier 2 is designed to provide intensive or targeted interventions to support students who are not responding to Tier 1.
Schools are responsible to teach academics and social behavior skills. We teach all students our academic curriculum to address grade level expectations. We teach all students to be safe, respectful, responsible learners in the classroom, hallways, playground and all other settings. We know these Tier 1 universal, that we teach, practice and recognize every day help create a predictable and positive learning environment. However, some students do not respond to our quality Tier 1 universal academic and behavioral instruction. Students who need additional support may display behaviors externally or of equal concern, are students who internalize the stress of school and home. The goal is to provide support to these students to meet their needs, to keep them in class learning and to avoid escalation to more intensive services.
- 10 Critical Features of Tier 2 Interventions (Courtesy MPS)
- Tier 2 Intervention Descriptions
- PBISWorld.com Tier 2
10 Critical Features of Tier 2 Interventions (Courtesy MPS)
- Linked directly to school-wide expectations and/or academic goals
- Continuously available for student participation
- Implemented within 3 school days of determination that student should receive the intervention
- Can be modified based on assessment and/or outcome data
- Includes structured prompts for ‘what to do’ in relevant situations
- Results in student receiving positive feedback from staff
- Includes a school-home communication exchange system at least weekly
- Orientation materials provide information for a student to get started on the intervention
- Orientation materials provide information for staff/ subs/ volunteers who have students using the intervention
- Opportunities to practice new skills are provided daily
Adapted from PBIS Illinois
Tier 2 Intervention Descriptions
Tier II Interventions Information & Definitions:
Brief Re-Teaches ARE NOT FORMAL TIER 2 INTERVENTIONS - This should take place within the environment at the time (or shortly after) the behavior occurs by the staff member who observes the behavior. It should take 1-2 minutes. Based off the classroom/school-wide matrix.
Touch bases ARE NOT FORMAL TIER 2 INTERVENTIONS - quick meeting (up to 5 minutes) occasionally done to see how students are doing or follow-up on a session.
ICO – Check In Check Out:
Students check in with designated CICO greeter at the beginning and at the end of each schoolday to receive positive contact, precorrects, reminders of schoolwide expectations and, if needed, basic school supplies. At the end of each class period, classroom teachers provide behavioral feedback, based on the schoolwide expectations on a Daily Progress Report Card (DPR).
- Should be based off of your data rules and match your schoolwide matrix
SIMPLE SAIG – (facilitated by any school staff member)
Data driven or formal Request for Assistance form completed by teacher/staff or parent.
Small or individual groups: Process to reteach behaviors from the schoolwide or classroom matrix (46 sessions) lasting 515 minutes. Staff will use Cool Tools/Lesson Plans to reteach expectations within a specific area or environment. Ideally, an adult who supervises that environment facilitates simple SAIG in the environment.
COMPLEX SAIG (by trained interventionist):
Data driven or formal Request for Assistance form completed by teacher/staff or parent.
68 sessions with a focus on a specific skill, no less that 1520 minutes/session. Small or individual groups. Examples may be:
- Academic: Specific skill training (68 sessions & 1520 minutes) with a curriculum: Truancy/attendance issues, organizational skills, study skills, homework help, strategies to pay attention/ ignore distractions, listen, completing work, test anxiety, asking for help, etc.
- Social Skills (Basic Counseling): Specific skill training (68 sessions & 1520 minutes) with a curriculum: new student, family change, grief, divorce, anger, selfesteem, friendship/ peer relations, bus expectations, more indepth version of simple SAIG topics, etc.
- Problem Solving: Specific skill training (68 sessions & 1520 minutes) with a curriculum: using selftalk, dealing with stress/ anxiety, managing difficult situations, team building, leadership skills, bullying support, etc.
MENTORING:
Ongoing contact with student – noncurriculum based. Staff or volunteers engage in relationship buildingover an extended period of time (Ex. 20 minutes per week)
BRIEF FBA/BIP:
Brief behavior plans are developed for one student at a time, based on an assessment of function of behavior by the Tier 2 Problem Solving Team. Brief Tier 2 behavior intervention plans address only one behavior, typically in one setting. Interventions are chosen or designed based on youth’s strengths, assessed function of behavior and skillsdeficits.
- See WSD forms for Brief FBA/BIP format
- Should schedule a team review date 4 weeks after implementation. Continue to review every 24 weeks.
COMPLEX FBA/BIP:
- WSD in process of adopting a Complex FBA/BIP format & procedures
- More time and staff intensive than Brief FBA/BIP
DATA SOURCE/ REFERRAL PROCESS:
- SWIS data
- Attendance records
- Student Request for Assistance by RtI A/B Team form
- Parent/Guardian request for assistance
- Other DEWS, EWS, Grades (middle school/high school level)
CHECK YOUR DATA RULES FOR ENTERING & EXITING INTERVENTIONS
How do the students get into an intervention? How do they get out of (exit) an intervention? What determines success in the intervention for a student? How will you monitor for success?
February 2015 JG
PBISWorld.com Tier 2
The following is a list of Tier 2 Interventions that may be implemented by schools:
Check-In/ Check-Out (CICO)
CICO is the initial intervention at the Tier 2 level. When CICO is implemented, the student checks in briefly with a designated adult (aka. “greeter”) who is a member of the school staff each morning and afternoon. The check-in process lasts no more than two to three minutes.
The adult begins the student’s day with a positive interaction, providing the student with verbal reminders about what is expected of them. The adult can also determine if a student is not ready for class and have the student remain with them for further assistance and guidance. Each student in the program receives a Daily Progress Report (DPR) that is used to track their behavior throughout the school day according to the expectations.
The teachers mark each section of the DPR with the student’s level of success at meeting the expectations for every class period. It is recommended that the teachers only write positive feedback while verbally providing corrective feedback. At the end of the school day, the student goes to their designated adult for check-out. The adult will provide feedback and encouragement to the student. The day’s points are added up and a student takes a copy home for a parent/guardian to sign. The points are also entered onto the SWIS software system by the CICO data entry person.
Individualized CICO
Individualized CICO involves adjusting one or more particular elements of the CICO framework for a specific student. Usually CICO should be the same for every student, you do not want to individualize for every student.
One could individualize the following aspects of CICO:
- Morning greeting time (student is always late)
- Morning Greeter adult (student does not get along with usual morning greeter)
- Add a check-in at a specific time (have student check in right after lunch as they usually struggle after lunch)
- Have teacher carry DPR (student usually loses the DPR)
- Others
Social Academic Instructional Group (SAIG)
Social Academic Instructional Group, also known as a SAIG, is a Tier 2 intervention that is intended to help all students be successful and to be at their best academically, socially, and behaviorally. Social Academic Instructional Groups are an important part of the PBIS System in our schools. The groups vary on duration and subject matter based upon individual student needs. Students are placed into this intervention based on data and/or teacher or parent referral. The groups meet for 20-30 minutes, 1-3 times per week, for 4-8 weeks; during a time that will not deter a child’s academic learning. The student(s) will meet with a school staff facilitator for direct teaching of prosocial, problem-solving or academic-behavior skills. SAIGs are often used in conjunction with a Daily Progress Report (DPR) to assist students in managing and monitoring their own choices during the school day. The Daily Progress Reports will support them while they work hard to follow the school-wide expectations.
Mentoring
Mentoring is a structured and trusting relationship that brings young people together with caring individuals who offer guidance, support and encouragement aimed at developing the competence and character of the mentee. A mentor is an adult at school who, along with parents, provides a young person with support, counsel, friendship, reinforcement and constructive example. Mentors are good listeners, people who care, people who want to help young people bring out strengths that are already there.
Mentoring is about one person helping another to achieve something. It is about giving help and support in a non-threatening way, in a manner that the recipient will appreciate and value and that will empower them to move forward with confidence towards what they want to achieve. Mentoring is also concerned with creating an informal environment in which one person can feel encouraged to discuss their needs and circumstances openly and in confidence with another person who is in a position to be of positive help to them.
Brief Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA/BIP)
Functional behavioral assessment (FBA) is generally considered a problem-solving process for addressing student problem behavior. It relies on a variety of techniques and strategies to identify the purposes of specific behavior and to help teams select interventions to directly address the problem behavior. Functional behavioral assessment should be integrated, as appropriate, throughout the process of developing, reviewing, and, if necessary, revising a student’s IEP or behavior plan.
A functional behavioral assessment looks beyond the behavior itself. The focus when conducting a functional behavioral assessment is on identifying significant, pupil-specific social, affective, cognitive, and/or environmental factors associated with the occurrence (and nonoccurrence) of specific behaviors. This broader perspective offers a better understanding of the function or purpose behind student behavior. Behavioral intervention plans based on an understanding of "why" a student misbehaves are extremely useful in addressing a wide range of problem behaviors.
Tier 3 Interventions/Supports
There are two types of Tier 3 behavioral interventions, either a Complex Functional Behavioral Assessment/Behavior Intervention Plan (FBA/BIP) or Educational Wraparound (WRAP). These interventions are very intense and individualized. The number of students receiving Tier 3 should represent no more than one to five percent of the total student population. If there are more than five percent of the total student population receiving Tier 3 interventions, than a review of the fidelity of implementation of Tier 1 and Tier 2 systems should take place.
Students may be identified for Tier 3 either by failure to respond to any of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 behavioral interventions and supports or may be referred to Tier 3 by teacher, parent or self. It is important to note that referrals to Tier 3 do not constitute automatic initiation of a Tier 3 intervention.
For each intervention, either FBA/BIP or WRAP/RENEW, an individualized team specific to the student, the student’s needs, and the family is developed. This team may include the following individuals:
- School Psychologist
- School Social Worker
- Teachers
- Administrator
- Counselor
- Additional staff who interact with student receiving the intervention
- Community Members (therapist, mentor, parole officer, etc.)
- Parent(s) and/or other family members
The Tier 3 Team uses Progress Monitoring data such as a Behavior Tracking Form (BTF), Daily Progress Report (DPR), Out-of-School Suspensions (OSS), In-School Suspensions (ISS), direct observation data and student attendance. The progress monitoring data will be reviewed as determined by the team.
- Family Centered Wrap Around
- Functional Behavioral Assessment/Behavior Intervention Plans (FBA/BIP)
PBIS on the Bus
The vision of the Wausau School District Transportation Committee is a commitment to excellence in safely transporting students, encouraging respectful and caring behavior while supporting District Shared Key Interests. We strive to encourage collaboration between First Student and the Wausau School District in order to proactively communicate with mutual respect.
RtI - Math
Tier 1 Supports:
- Core Curriculum:
- K-5: Ready Classroom Math
- 6-12: Carnegie Math
- Differentiation
Tier 2 Interventions:
- Some students will not respond to Tier 1 supports alone and will need to be in Tier 2 interventions focused on their math growth. The Wausau School District uses FastBridge Learning to Universally Screen all students K-6th grade three times per year. Students who score in the bottom 24th% of their FastBridge Learning screeners for math by grade level are considered eligible to receive an intervention. Each grade level needs to analyze their students performance and determine if the students flagged should participate in intervention.
- Current interventions for math in Tier 2 include explicit, systematic instruction in the area of concern for math supplemented with approved research and evidenced based computer based math programs. Interventions are skill specific and matched to meet the needs of each group based on results of continuous progress monitoring.
- Interventions must be given to program fidelity requirements
- Progress Monitoring must occur weekly (K-5) or every three weeks (6-8, unless it is part of an initial referral for Specific Learning Disabilities wherein it will be collected weekly).
- Students will be progress monitored using FastBridge Learning.
- The intervention is conducted by the classroom teacher, a specialized teacher or an external interventionist. The intervention must occur outside of the core instructional time.
Tier 3 Interventions:
Examples of Tier 3 intensive intervention services might include many of the supplemental services provided in Tier 1 and Tier 2, but with increased frequency/intensity and/or duration and a more individualized implementation strategy. Tier 3 may or may not include students in special education - it is dependent on the individual students’ needs.
In addition, Tier 3 may also require any of the following:
- Replacement curriculum
- Grade/Subject acceleration
- Special education/ pull out services
- Intensified/Individualized explicit instruction in an identified skill or set of skills.
- Modified intervention service delivery: individualization, frequency and length of sessions, duration of intervention cycle and/or group size.
RtI - Literacy
Tier 1:
- RtI Tier 1 focuses on the Core Curriculum. In this iter, literacy programs and resources, assessments, literacy block structure and instructional methods are identified along with student performance goals, best practices, and universal strategies.
- Core Curriculum:
- K-2: SuperKids
- 3-5: Wonders
- Differentiation
Tier 2 Interventions:
- Some students will not respond to Tier 1 Supports alone, and will be in need of Tier 2 Interventions focused on their Literacy growth.The Wausau School District uses FastBridge Learning to Universally Screen all students K-6th grade three times per year. Students who score in the bottom 24th% of their FastBridge Learning measure for literacy by grade level are eligible to receive an intervention. Each grade level needs to analyze their students FastBridge Learning scores and determine if the students in the bottom 24th % should participate in an intervention.
- Current interventions for literacy skill weaknesses in Tier 2 include explicit, systematic instruction in small groups or approved research based computer programs. Interventions are skill specific and matched to meet the needs of each group based on results of continuous progress monitoring.
- Literacy interventions at the Tier 2 level must occur according to the program fidelity recommendations.
- Progress monitoring must occur weekly and should be entered into the FastBridge Learning system.
- The intervention is conducted by the classroom teacher, a specialized teacher, or an external interventionist. The intervention must occur outside of the core instructional time.
SEL / Leader In Me
The Wausau School District is proud to be a Leader in Me District.
Leader in Me is a whole-district improvement process based on the idea
that everyone can be a leader. This evidence-based approach empowers students with the leadership and life-skills they need to thrive in the present and future.
We focus on developing the whole child by:
teaching LEADERSHIP to every student,
creating a CULTURE of student empowerment,
and aligning systems to drive results in ACADEMICS.
7 Habits of Highly Effective People
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People is one of the key frameworks of the Leader in Me process. In addition to helping students learn and apply leadership skills, the 7 Habits give us a common language in building a supportive emotional environment.
4 Disciplines of Execution
The 4 Disciplines of Execution is another key framework of the Leader in Me that helps us to identify, track, and achieve academic and personal Wildly Important Goals (WIGs).
Contact Angie Lloyd, Director of Pupil Services for more information.
-------------------------------------------------
Specific Learning Disability (SLD)
What is Specific Learning Disability (SLD)?
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) defines SLD as “a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell or perform mathematical calculations, including conditions such as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia and developmental aphasia. The term does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, motor disabilities, cognitive disabilities, emotional disturbance, cultural factors, environmental, or economic disadvantage.”
On November 4, 2013 the state of Wisconsin changed the eligibility criteria for SLD requiring districts to use data from RtI to determine a student's eligibility for SLD. TWO scientific and research based interventions (SRBIs) must be done for each area of academic concern with the student. An SRBI is an intervention in which the effects have been studied and found to be successful, it provides a substantial number of instructional minutes beyond what is provided to all students, and must be implemented with fidelity- which means it must be applied in a manner highly consistent with its design and implemented at least 80% of the recommended number of minutes, weeks, and sessions. In addition, the students progress within the interventions must be monitored weekly using a standardized norm referenced tool to assess their rate of improvement. Once a student receives 2 SRBIs in each area of academic concern the following three criteria are considered:
Inadequate Classroom Achievement: academic skills are 1.25 standard deviation below mean-- (Standard score of 81 or below)
Insufficient progress (students progress is same or less to same age peers, or the progress is greater but won't reach average within a reasonable amount of time, or progress is greater but the intensity of resources necessary to obtain this rate of progress cannot be maintained in regular education)
Exclusionary Factor(s): May not identify a student if achievement or progress is primarily due to Exclusionary factors (environmental or economic disadvantage, cultural factors, lack of appropriate instruction, limited English proficiency, or other impairments).
Students being evaluated for a Specific Learning Disability (SLD)
There are eight potential areas of a specific learning disability:
Students being evaluated for a Specific Learning Disability (SLD)
There are eight potential areas of a specific learning disability:
- Basic Reading
- Reading Fluency
- Reading Comprehension
- Mathematical Calculation
- Mathematical Problem Solving
- Written Expression
- Oral Expression
- Listening Comprehension
Basic Reading
Reading comprehension refers to the ability to understand and make meaning of written text and includes a multifaceted set of skills. Reading comprehension is influenced by oral language development including new vocabulary acquisition, listening comprehension, working memory, application of comprehension monitoring strategies and understanding of text structure including titles, paragraphing, illustrations and other details. Reading comprehension is significantly affected by basic reading skills.
Reading Fluency
Reading Comprehension
Reading comprehension refers to the ability to understand and make meaning of written text and includes a multifaceted set of skills. Reading comprehension is influenced by oral language development including new vocabulary acquisition, listening comprehension, working memory, application of comprehension monitoring strategies and understanding of text structure including titles, paragraphing, illustrations and other details. Reading comprehension is significantly affected by basic reading skills.
Mathematical Calculation
Mathematical Problem Solving
Mathematical problem solving is the ability to use decision-making skills to apply mathematical concepts and understandings to real world situations. It is the functional combination of computation knowledge and application knowledge, and involves the use of mathematical computation skills and fluency, language, reasoning, reading, and visual-spatial skills in solving problems. Essentially, it is applying mathematical knowledge at the conceptual level.
Written Expression
Written expression is the communication of ideas, thoughts, and feelings and involves two separate components: composition, or the generation of ideas; and the written production of handwriting and spelling. Required skills include using oral language, thought, grammar, text fluency, sentence construction and planning, and execution of the writing process. Spelling difficulties alone cannot be considered to represent a specific learning disability in written expression.
Oral Expression
Oral expression is the ability to convey wants, needs, thoughts, and ideas in a meaningful way using appropriate syntactic, pragmatic, semantic and phonological language structures. It relates to a student’s ability to express ideas, explain thinking, retell stories, categorize, and compare and contrast concepts or ideas, make references and problem solve verbally.
Listening Comprehension
Listening comprehension refers to the understanding of the implications and explicit meanings of words and sentences of spoken language. This includes following directions, comprehending questions, and listening and comprehending in order to learn (auditory attention, auditory memory and auditory perception). Listening comprehension also includes the ability to make connections to previous learning.
Links & Resources
WI-RtI Brief: Specific Learning Disabilities Rule Implementation and RtI
WI Department of Public Instruction FAQ
Title I
Title I Program Overview
Title I, Part A (Title I) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESEA) provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers or high percentages of children from low-income families to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards. Federal funds are allocated yearly to participating school districts.
- US Department of Education
For the 2020-2021 school year, eight schools located within the Wausau School District meet criteria for participation in Title 1 school-wide programs. The school-wide program description, offers learning opportunities for all students who attend these public schools. In addition, there are three local private school systems who meet the criteria for targeted assistance and specific schools within these systems participate in the Title 1 program.
Title I Goals
- Close the achievement gap for students in all subgroups in English language arts and math.
- Provide every student access to a well-rounded education that meets their learning needs in an appropriate, healthy, and safe environment.
- Provide professional learning opportunities for teachers, para educators, and principals to enhance instructional best practices and the implementation of the teaching and learning process for all students.
- Utilize evidence-based interventions and support services to ensure every student graduates from high school prepared for college or career plans.
Parent Communication
Hiring Requirements outlined in Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015
The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, changed requirements for paraprofessionals. As in the past, paraprofessionals working in Title I programs or in Title I schoolwide buildings still must hold a high school diploma. They must further demonstrate qualifications.
Section 1111 (g) (2) (J) of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires that the State educational agency will ensure that all paraprofessionals working in a program supported with funds under Title I, Part A meet applicable State certification requirements. Additionally, Section 1111 (g)(2)(M) requires that the State has Professional Standards in place for paraprofessionals, "including qualifications that were in place on the day before the date of enactment of the Every Student Succeeds Act."
Therefore, Local Education Agencies (LEAs) are required to have all instructional paraprofessionals in Title I schoolwide buildings and all instructional paraprofessionals who are funded by Title I and working in a Title I Targeted Assistance program meet hiring requirements. All paraprofessionals in Title I funded programs need to meet the following criteria prior to employment or placement in a Title I Schoolwide building.
Hiring Requirement Options:
- Have obtained an associate (or higher) degree, or
- Have at least two years of post-secondary education that is equivalent to at least 48 semester hours from an accredited higher education institution, or
- Have met a rigorous standard of quality and be able to demonstrate knowledge of and the ability to assist in instructing reading, writing, and mathematics (or, as appropriate, reading readiness, and mathematics readiness) by successfully completing the WorkKeys ACT assessment.
School Improvement Plans
Virtual Learning Day Protocols
What are the benefits of a Virtual Learning Day?
The biggest benefit of Virtual Learning Days is the continuation of learning and student achievement. This type of instructional delivery provides students the ability to interact with instructional content to develop and deepen understanding. A Virtual Learning Day also provides students needed exposure to a critical aspect of being considered College and Career Ready; the ability to independently complete activities while leveraging available technologies. Additionally, Virtual Learning Days allow for a predictable school calendar as the need for added minutes or days is greatly decreased as inclement weather days will be counted as instructional days.
When can a Virtual Learning Day take place?
A Virtual Learning Day can occur anytime during the school year and can be used to continue student learning on days when it is not possible to be in the physical school building due to inclement weather, widespread illness, flooding, power outages, or other factors which would result in the closing of a school building.
How does a Virtual Learning Day work?
Students will follow a flexible schedule as directed by their teachers. This will include a combination of live instruction via Google Meet and independent/self-paced learning activities throughout the day. Staff will ensure students understand learning objectives, supporting activities, and the requirements for completion.
What if a student does not have access to a device at home?
All Wausau School District students (K-12) are issued either an iPad or Chromebook as a tool to use when interacting with instruction. In preparation for a Virtual Learning Day, all students will be expected to bring their District-issued device home for the purpose of completing work assigned.
What if a student does not have access to the internet at home?
If a family does not have internet access at home, a District-issued hot spot can be issued from your school librarian. Please contact your child's teacher for more information.
What will a virtual school day look like?
- Student Guidelines
- Grades K-5: Join a live Google Meet at times pre-established by your teacher. (One in the morning and one in the afternoon)
- PreK-2: Up to 60 minutes of student engagement in independent/self-paced activities.
- Grades 3-5: Up to 2 hours of student engagement in independent/self-paced activities.
- Grades 6-12: Follow your regular class schedule by logging into the Google Meet for each class at the beginning of each period.
- All Grades: Use learning management system to engage in independent/self-paced learning activities as directed by your teacher.
- All Grades: Communicate with teachers and peers, including asking questions and seeking support as needed.
- Teacher Guidelines
- Deliver instruction and learning opportunities aligned with curricular standards to support continued learning.
- Use learning management system for instruction, student support, and student/family communication.
- Upload recordings of any direct instruction so that students can access it at a later time/as needed.